top of page

The Impact of Suggestibility in Child Abuse Investigations

Child abuse investigations require specialized training and expertise, particularly when it comes to understanding the impact of suggestibility on a child's statement of sexual or physical abuse. Suggestibility refers to the extent to which a child's memory and recall of an event can be influenced by external factors, such as leading questions or suggestive language.

When a child is asked leading questions or given suggestive cues, they may begin to incorporate those cues into their memory of the event, even if they did not originally experience it in that way. This can result in inaccurate or unreliable statements, which can have serious consequences for both the child and the accused.

It is crucial to avoid leading questions that could potentially impact a child's statement of abuse. Examples of leading questions include "Did he touch you inappropriately?" which suggests that something inappropriate happened, and "Did he hurt you?" which assumes that the child was hurt. Another example is "Did he make you feel uncomfortable?" which suggests that the child should feel uncomfortable. These types of questions can influence the child's response and potentially lead to an inaccurate statement.

During a child abuse investigation, suggestive cues can potentially impact a child's statement of abuse. Examples of suggestive cues include facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, repeating questions, and providing information. A facial expression such as a frown, nod, or smile can convey to the child what the adult expects as an answer. Tone of voice may also convey to the child what the adult expects as an answer, and body language such as gestures, eye contact, or posture can influence how the child responds to a question. If an adult repeatedly asks the same question, it may suggest to the child that a particular answer is expected, leading to a potentially inaccurate statement. Similarly, if an adult provides information about what they believe happened, it could potentially influence the child's statement. To minimize the impact of suggestive cues on a child's statement, investigators and parents should use neutral language, use open-ended questions, avoid repeating questions, and allow the child to speak freely without interruption. Additionally, the child's age and developmental stage should be taken into account when conducting an investigation. Younger children may be more susceptible to suggestion, while older children may be better able to accurately recall and report the details of an event.

It is also important to recognize that suggestibility can work both ways. While it is important to avoid leading questions and suggestive language, it is equally important to avoid dismissing or minimizing a child's statement of abuse. Children who have experienced abuse may already feel ashamed or confused, and dismissing their statement can cause further harm.

Dismissing or minimizing a child's statement of abuse can have serious consequences and is considered a form of revictimization. When a child discloses abuse, it is essential to provide a safe and supportive environment for them to feel comfortable sharing their experience. Dismissing or minimizing their statement can cause the child to feel unheard and unsupported, leading them to withdraw from further disclosure and potentially suffer from long-term emotional consequences.

Minimizing a child's statement can take different forms, including blaming the child for what happened, downplaying the severity of the abuse, or telling the child to "just forget about it." These responses can cause further harm to the child and can discourage them from disclosing further abuse or seeking help.

Suggestibility can be affected by external factors such as the presence of other children or adults, so it is important to conduct interviews in a way that minimizes suggestibility. Child abuse professionals should be trained in the use of forensic interviewers and child advocacy centers, and the best-practices systems on how to conduct interviews with children, using non-leading language, avoiding interruptions, and setting an appropriate stage for disclosure of abuse.

Parents also have a role to play in minimizing suggestibility by providing a safe and supportive environment for their child to disclose abuse. This includes listening to their child without judgement, reassuring them that they are not to blame, and seeking professional help if necessary.

It is important to note that suggestibility does not necessarily mean that a child's statement is false. Rather, it refers to the potential for external factors to impact the accuracy of the statement. It is up to the investigators to assess the validity of the statement through careful questioning, corroborating evidence, and expert analysis.

In conclusion, suggestibility is an important factor to consider in child abuse investigations. By understanding the potential for external factors to impact a child's statement, and taking steps to minimize suggestibility, we can better ensure that children receive the support and justice they deserve. This requires a multi-faceted approach that involves specialized training for child abuse professionals, a supportive environment for children to disclose abuse, and careful consideration of the child's age and developmental stage.



Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page